Assume both statements are true. Which conclusion follows?
Some auditors are inspectors. All inspectors are bonded officers.
- AAll bonded officers are auditors.
- BSome auditors are bonded officers. (correct)
- CAll auditors are bonded officers.
- DSome auditors are not bonded officers.
At least one of the auditors is an inspector, and everyone who is an inspector is a bonded officer, so at least some auditors are bonded officers. Follow the shared term through both statements, and claim no more than they allow. A conclusion that reverses the terms, or upgrades some to all, does not follow.
- A This swaps the two terms. The premises support a claim about the first group, not about the second.
- C The premises do not license a claim about every member of the group.
- D Nothing in the premises establishes an exception.