Assume both statements are true. Which conclusion follows?
Some budget officers are chemists. All chemists are bonded officers.
- ASome budget officers are bonded officers. (correct)
- BSome budget officers are not bonded officers.
- CAll bonded officers are budget officers.
- DAll budget officers are bonded officers.
At least one of the budget officers is a chemist, and everyone who is a chemist is a bonded officer, so at least some budget officers are bonded officers. Follow the shared term through both statements, and claim no more than they allow. A conclusion that reverses the terms, or upgrades some to all, does not follow.
- B Nothing in the premises establishes an exception.
- C This swaps the two terms. The premises support a claim about the first group, not about the second.
- D The premises do not license a claim about every member of the group.